Yesterday’s push to lower yields fizzled. Today’s the day?
April 1, 2025
*************
—Flight to quality bid Monday evaporated as stocks stabilized. TYM5 posted an early high of 111-225 but came back to settle 111-07, up just 0.5/32. Trade of the day was new buy of 60k SFRZ5 9625/9650/9675/9700 call condor for 5.0. Settled 5.0 vs 9637.5. Max value occurs at settle between middle two strikes which would be consistent with FF target 3.25/3.5 vs current 4.25/4.5. The last FOMC projected two cuts for end-of-2025 to 3.875% mid, this guy is looking for four.
–Major data of the week will be Payrolls on Friday, looking for 130 to 140k, with the unemp rate unch’d at 4.1% (high rate over the past year has been 4.2%). Powell speaks on economic outlook post-payrolls. Today we have JOLTS expected 7655k vs 7740k. ISM Mfg expected 49.5 vs 50.3. Prices expected 64.6, likely skewed by tariffs. Employment 47.2 from 47.6. Tariff announcement tomorrow. Fed’s Kugler speaks Wednesday afternoon on “Inflation Expectations and Monetary Policymaking”. Given the current surge in expectations, versus relatively muted market indicators, it should be interesting.
–This morning the bond bid is back. with TYM5 currently 111-20+, near yesterday’s high even though ESM5 is nearly unchanged. Highest contract on the SOFR strip is SFRU6 which settled 9657.5. The highest this contract has traded since last October is yesterday’s high at 9666.5. Currently 9663. On a technical basis, it appears ready to break out for a move nearing 9700.
Assets have risk
March 31, 2025
*****************
–Stocks under follow-thru pressure following a poor session Friday. SPX was down 2% and Nasdaq Comp -2.7%. SPX ended 5581. I would think a reasonable target would be somewhere around 4800 to 5000. High at the end of 2021/start of 2022 was 4819. The halfway back level from the 2022 low of 3491 to this year’s high of 6147 is 4819. A 20% drop from this year’s ath is 4918. Obviously that sort of move would take some time, but in the five months from October 2023 to end of March 2024, SPX surged 1144 points. The Feb high of 6147 minus 1144 is 5003.
–Friday’s trade in rate futures felt somewhat more urgent. SFRH6 thru SFRH9 settled up 11.5 to 12.5. Five yr was the leader on the treasury curve, sinking 11.9 bps to 3.979%, while tens fell 11.4 to 4.253%. The most inverted one-yr SOFR calendar is front SFRM5/M6 which settled at a new recent low -62.5 (9593.5/9656.0). At a price of 9593.5 in M5 the yield is 4.065%, which is right around a 25 bp ease; EFFR is currently 4.33% and would move to 4.08% on a cut.
–As mentioned in yesterday’s note, PCE data mixed: Personal Income was up a solid 0.8% but Spending only 0.1%. Prices were slightly firmer than expected with yoy 2.5% and Core 2.8%. More worrisome were final University of Michigan survey data. The one-yr inflation measure edged up to 5%. The Economic Expectations number was dismal at 52.6. There are just a few lower readings: 2008 at 49.2 and 2009 at 50.5 (GFC). 2011 at 47.6. 2022 is the lowest at 47.3.
–End of month and quarter today. Chgo PMI expected 45.0 from 45.5. Tariff day tomorrow.
–Just another couple of broad strokes regarding international capital flows. Market Huddle featured guest Julian Brigden who noted that the US equity weight of new investment flows is 70% of every dollar, a huge pct relative to US GDP/global GDP. I recreated a chart he mentioned, SPX / FEZ ratio, where FEZ is the Eurostoxx etf. As can be seen, it’s testing a long-term trendline. On a related note, Atlanta Fed GDP Now has added a ‘gold-adjusted’ measure. Why? Because US imports of gold were so large that they mechanically depressed GDP. Obviously, recalibrations of capital flows that are already unbalanced can have a huge effect on markets, with little change in economic ‘fundamentals’. Those catch up later….

Bluff
March 30, 2025 – Weekly Comment
**************************************
This might not be the greatest analogy, but it’s a story I enjoyed hearing firsthand, so here it goes. There was a large filling broker in front month Eurodollars. This is, obviously, well before SOFR, and when 1 bp was the minimum tick, not 0.5 bp. It was at a time when the entire strip in futures would trade perhaps 100-250k, not 4 million like Friday’s volume.
At the time, there were no restrictions on dual trading. That is, a broker could be standing in the pit and trading his own position while filling orders for customers. Front-running was still a rule violation, you couldn’t get a big buy order and buy a couple hundred for yourself first, but other than that the rules were easier.

Anyway, this particular broker (not pictured; wasn’t PAT and wasn’t OPA) filled orders for Solomon Bros, and some other large houses. He told me he was short something like 1000 contracts in his personal account on a day that was slowly but unrelentingly bid. So, he offered 3000 contracts in an attempt to turn the tide. The pit generally would think it was a ‘paper’ offer, and at that time, such an order might have even been large enough to draw in some sellers. Open outcry! 3000 at 9… 3000 at 9! He offered for a couple of minutes, trying to hold the market down. Here’s the fun part: one local just looked him in the eyes and said ‘buy ‘em’. Never made eye contact again, just glanced down and impassively carded up the trade. Of course it’s immediately 9 bid, trading 10s. As my friend recounted this tale, he said every bit of air immediately exited his lungs, slumping his shoulders for added emphasis to convey the distress. The bluff (spoof) that didn’t work.
What made me think of this particular story is the NVDA/ CoreWeave entanglement. The IPO for CoreWeave, an AI data-center company backed by its supplier NVDA, occurred Friday. MSFT is CRWV’s largest customer. The IPO initially was supposed to value the company at $27 to $32 billion. On March 19, Reuters reported a planned IPO price of $47 to $55, to raise $2.3 to 2.7b. Every news clip I saw said the offering was oversubscribed. On March 26, FT reported that CRWV had triggered a technical default last year as it used loan proceeds from Blackstone to expand into Europe, when collateral for the loan was specified to be US assets. Blackstone forgave this ‘oversight’. On March 27 CRWV announced plans to cut the IPO size to $1.5b, and the price to $40, and NVDA announced plans to anchor the deal with a $250 million order to buy at $40. All of a sudden it’s as simple as the pit. NVDA’s already long. Now showing a big bid to bluff the market. “Hey Jensen, you’re filled. Want more? It’s 39 offer.” During this time, rumors continued to swirl about MSFT cutting back on AI and data-center investments. One report I read said MSFT cancelled a $12b dollar CRWV order, but Open AI jumped in as savior and took MSFT’s place. ‘Just Dario’ (blogger/podcast) amusingly refers to Open AI as being in “the money incinerator business.”
I am no expert on AI, etc. But I do remember Enron. Not that this is the same, but it might be prudent to stand aside. In a broader sense, US stocks have been supported by AI hype, deregulation, a benign Fed, and hopes that DOGE will correct the govt spending spree. AI seems vulnerable, DOGE might be doing too good of a job. The Fed just EASED with a cutback of QT and SPX is lower in the aftermath. If only there were a signal.
Survey data should be taken with a grain of salt, but U of Michigan’s Consumer Expectations provides backing for Powell’s comments at the press conference: “…we do understand that sentiment has fallen off pretty sharply…”
The chart below shows Expectations in white, oil in blue and SPX in green.

The Index of Consumer Expectations focuses on three areas: how consumers view prospects for their own financial situation, how they view prospects for the general economy over the near term, and their view of prospects for the economy over the long term.
There are just a few lower readings in expectations: 2008 at 49.2 and 2009 at 50.5 (GFC). 2011 at 47.6. 2022 is the lowest at 47.3 (Fed hikes, stocks breaking and oil bid). Covid was way up at 65.9. Consumers being squeezed by higher oil prices is a contributing factor to falling confidence. Not this time. Oil’s price is dropping.
I’ve written several times that I think the Fed will ease in May. Met with derision. However, there are two employment reports before the May 7 FOMC, Friday’s and May 2. SPX is down less than 10% from Feb’s all-time high. At the low a couple of weeks ago, Nasdaq Comp was down 11%. What if a slide to minus 20% occurs? Powell has every incentive to cut 25 in a nod to Trump. Of course, if the Fed does cut there will be MASS HYSTERIA claiming the Fed has lost credibility by easing after having raised inflation estimates. The ‘lost credibility’ phrase has been around as long as I have been in the business. We’re going into ‘Liberation Day’. What are we hanging on to?
On a more serious note, the Cleveland Fed and BLS publish a quarterly figure of ‘New-tenant rents’. (Noted by Danielle DiMartino Booth). At the end of Q4 this number was -2.4%. Shelter is 32% of CPI. Next release should be towards the end of April. The report notes: “Sample sizes for the New Tenant Rent Index are much smaller than for the All Tenant Regressed Rent Index or the official CPI; this is especially the case in the first and fourth quarters when fewer moves happen.”
The real concern over a Fed cut will be reflected by a surge in long-end rates. Indeed after the Fed’s ‘no policy implication’ QT ease on March 19, the 30y yield rose about 18 bps to 4.72%. However, this week’s close was 4.63%. I’m sure Bessent would prefer the Fed holding pat. The risk is that falling stocks, whether related to tariffs, a slowing economy, or employment deterioration (all of the above?) overwhelms every other consideration. Chart below of 2/30 is clearly in steepening trend, but actually low by historical standards.

Last week I wrote that the SFRU5/U6/U7 fly was tracking well with the recent move in ESM, but noted that the fly had made a new low while ESM had bounced. This week, another new low in the fly at -48.0 (from -47.0 last week). Stocks gave up the gains (caught down).
It’s not panic if you’re first (paraphrasing from the movie Margin Call).
Ease trades (mentioned last week) SFRK5 9600/9625/9637.5 c fly 1x3x2 settled 2.0. SFRM5 9600/9625/9643.75 c fly settled 2.75.
3/21/2025 | 3/28/2025 | chg | ||
UST 2Y | 392.5 | 390.6 | -1.9 | |
UST 5Y | 401.4 | 397.9 | -3.5 | |
UST 10Y | 424.8 | 425.3 | 0.5 | |
UST 30Y | 459.2 | 463.1 | 3.9 | |
GERM 2Y | 213.2 | 201.9 | -11.3 | |
GERM 10Y | 276.5 | 272.7 | -3.8 | |
JPN 20Y | 226.2 | 224.5 | -1.7 | |
CHINA 10Y | 185.2 | 181.5 | -3.7 | |
SOFR M5/M6 | -59.5 | -62.5 | -3.0 | |
SOFR M6/M7 | 5.0 | 3.0 | -2.0 | |
SOFR M7/M8 | 14.0 | 15.0 | 1.0 | |
EUR | 108.22 | 108.28 | 0.06 | |
CRUDE (CLK5) | 68.28 | 69.36 | 1.08 | |
SPX | 5667.56 | 5580.94 | -86.62 | -1.5% |
VIX | 19.28 | 21.65 | 2.37 | |
MOVE | 94.54 | 96.83 | 2.29 | |
New Curve highs
March 28, 2025
****************
–New highs in many curve measures. For example 2/10 up to 37 bps (+4.5) and 5/30 at 63 (+3.0). 2/10 had printed higher in January at 42.3, but 5/30 has surpassed the high from last September of 61.4 and is highest since the very start of 2022. 2y (new) 3.996%, down 1.2 bps and 10y +3.3 bps to 4.367%.
–SOFR curve steeper as well, with new highs in deferred calendar spreads. For example, SFRM7/SFRM8 one-year spread settled 15.5 (9641.0/9625.5), up 2.0 on the day. These back spreads typically move slowly; on March 3, to start the month, it was 8.0. My interpretation is that term-premium is increasing and/or the market is concerned about forward inflation, and perhaps becoming less confident about Treasury being able to easily sell longer dated debt. Perceptions of a looser Fed going forward is another possible signal.
–Main news today PCE Prices: expected 0.3 with Core also 0.3 m/m. YOY expected 2.5 from 2.5 last, with Core 2.7 from 2.6. Truflation is running at 1.8%.
–Gold made a new ATH yesterday, and current GCJ5 is 3081.10, +20.10 to another new high. Spot silver high last year 34.90, currently 34.41.
–This may have little impact on the market in general, but CoreWeave expected to begin trading today. Interesting in that it’s an AI play, but the valuation has been ratcheted lower, not higher. So, from an earlier estimate of around $30 billion, it’s now $19b and NVDA was compelled to take this step:
“Nvidia will anchor the CoreWeave IPO at the price with a $250 million order [at $40], a person familiar with the matter told Reuters earlier on Thursday.”
X contributors like @JG_Nuke and @DarioCpx have been saying CoreWeave (& NVDA) have been using shady accounting to support valuations. Now we’ll get to see how it plays out in the public markets.
Well, if you adjust it by the price of REAL money…
March 27, 2025
****************
–Yields ended slightly higher, with tens and 30s both up 3 bps to 4.334% and 4.682%. SOFR contracts from Z5 to Z9 down 1.5 to 3 bps. 7-yr auction today.
–While price changes were minor, vol firmed, perhaps a spillover from weak equity prices, with SPX falling 1.1%. VIX slightly higher at 18.52. Early buyer of 80k SFRZ5 9562.5/9537.5ps for 1.75. Top strike 4.375% with EFFR 4.33%. New buyer of 40k SFRM5 9550 for 0.5. That strike is currently 38 bps otm and 17 bps above current EFFR. The 9562.5p also settled 0.5. Of course it could be uncomfortable being short wings for 2 ½ months if the wheels come off the rails. Also a roll of 22k 0QM5 9712.5c into 0QU5 9750c, settled 4.5 in 0QM5 vs 9643.0 in M6 and 5.25 in 0QU5 vs 9645.5 in U6. Extending the time but paying for it with a much higher call strike.
–It feels as if there’s energy building below the surface in rates. However, prices and spreads are muted for the time being. NY Fed released its March Corporate Bond Distress Index, and… nothing to see here:
- Corporate bond market functioning appears healthy. The end-of-month market-level CMDI is unchanged compared with last month and is just below its historical 5th percentile.
–The tendency is always that things look ok, maybe a few small cracks, and then ka-boom. Typically looks obvious in hindsight. Maybe that’s the message of gold, with GCJ5 up $26 this morning over 3048, looking to test recent all-time-highs.
–Final Q4 GDP today. But as we approach the end date of Q1, it’s probably more important to focus on ATL Fed’s GDPNow which is -1.8%. So I pulled up the site:
https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow
and had to rub my eyes! Is THIS NEW?? They’ve now added a GOLD-ADJUSTED GDP-NOW!! We’re not in Kansas anymore.
When the hard data confirms
March 26, 2025
****************
–Yields slightly lower Tuesday, retracing a small part of Monday’s rise. Tens down 2.5 bps to 4.304%. FFJ4 settled exactly at the EFFR rate of 4.33%, at 9567.0. One year forward FFJ5 settled 9642.5 or 3.575, three-quarters of a percent lower (8 FOMC meetings in between). New high in 5/30 treasury spread, 60 bps (4.052% & 4.652%). The high of last September was 61.3, intervening low was 25. Current level testing Sept, is the highest since 2021, before the Fed started to hike. Five-yr auction today, followed by 7s tomorrow.
–Early buyer of 60k 0QU5 9550p for 4.5 (ref 9642.5). Settled 3.75 vs 9648.5, nearly 100 bps otm (OI +49k). The 100 bp CALL otm is the 9750 strike, which settled 7.25. The 9550 strike is 4.5%, which is the upper end of the band of the current FF target, 4.25 to 4.5%. The 2.5% strike, the 9750c is nearly 2x as much premium, but the strike is 200 bps away from the current upper band.
–You would have to think the economy is going to take a cliff-dive to buy the 9750 strike, right? Well, today’s Consumer Confidence number was the lowest in four years at 92.9. Philly Fed Services at -32.5, lowest in 5 years (covid). From a CNBC survey:
The economy will enter a recession in the second half of 2025, according to a majority of chief financial officers responding to the quarterly CNBC CFO Council Survey.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/25/recession-is-coming-pessimistic-corporate-cfos-say-cnbc-survey.html
And from FT: Moody’s warns on deteriorating outlook for US public finances
–Will the hard data lag in confirming? Below are Powell’s comments relating to sentiment, at the last press conference, highlights added:
But the second factor is, it’s so highly uncertain, is just, you know, we’re sitting here thinking, and we obviously are in touch with businesses and households all over the country. We have an extraordinary network of contacts that come in through the reserve banks and put it in the Beige Book, and also through contacts at the Board. And we get all that, and we do understand that sentiment has fallen off pretty sharply, but economic activity has not yet. And so we’re watching carefully, so I would tell people that the economy seems to be, seems to be healthy. We understand that sentiment is quite negative at this time, and that probably has to do with, you know, turmoil at the beginning of an administration. It’s making, you know, big changes in areas of policy. And that’s probably part of it. I do think the underlying unhappiness people have about the economy though is more, is more about the price level. [rather than actual current inflation]
Confidence Game
March 25, 2025
****************
–Yields moved solidly higher Monday, with tens up 9.1 bps to 4.329%, matching the current EFFR of 4.33%. Yields in front of tens are lower and longer maturities are higher. SFRM5 settled down 5 at 9587.5 or 4.125%. That’s not even one full ease, with FOMCs on May 7 and June 18.
–Stocks powered higher, with SPX up 1.8%. As of yesterday’s close, SPX has reclaimed 246 points or 39% of the mid-Feb to mid-March plunge of 623 points. The Fib 38.2 retrace is 5759, yesterday’s close was 5767.
–Late buyer TY wk4 (3/28) 110.5c 0’17 covered 110-17, (32 in straddle) 35k. Settled 17 vs 110-175.
–Today’s news: Philly Fed Services were -13.1 last. New Home Sales expected 680k from 657k. Consumer Confidence expected 94.0 which would be lowest in 4 years. Does the soft data portend lower economic activity? (Powell questioned the same thing at last week’s press conference). 2y auction.
–FNMA ended above $7, having been near $1 pre-election. From mid-Jan to now it’s been between 5 and 8, and is currently trying the upside again. FMCC looks similar Will privatization of the GSEs spark easier conditions in the housing/mortgage markets?

Targeted tariffs
March 24, 2025
****************
–Theme of the day is targeted tariffs which has helped stock futures build on last week’s bounce and undermined support for fixed income. News today includes PMIs, with Mfg expected 51.8 from 52.7. Services 51.0 from 51.0. Auctions of 2, 5 & 7 year notes start tomorrow.
–Friday featured little change in rates, with tens +1.7 to 4.248%. The two-yr yield was slightly lower at 3.946%. While 2/10 did NOT make a new high, SOFR calendars from reds back DID edge to new highs. SFRU5 +2.5 to 9617.5, U6 +2.0 to 9654, U7 +1 to 9643.5 and U8 unch’d at 9630.
–5/30 treasury spread ended at highest level since late September at 58.4. The high in September (61.4) was associated with the Fed’s first ease. This area of 58-60 bps is the halfway point of the pre-hike highs in 2021, 163, to the hiking lows in late 2022 and early 2023 of -46. The low in March 2023 occurred in conjunction with the regional banking crisis.
–Five-year at 4% reflects a soft economy with expectations of further Fed easing. Long-bond at 4.60 isn’t so much about inflation, but rather about possible increases in term premium as gov’t funding issues could become acute. Tax and tariff receipts could easily fall short of expectations while DOGE cuts don’t keep up with spending increases on things like unemployment benefits.

SOFR pricing
March 23, 2025 – Weekly Comment
************************************
Peak contracts on the SOFR strip have been in the 6th and 7th slots, what I would refer to as the middle reds. Current peak is SFRU6, 2nd red, sixth slot, which settled 9654 or 3.46%. Despite increased measures of inflation expectations, both from surveys and from the Fed’s own SEP, Summary of Economic Projections, SFRU6 settled only 2.5 bps lower than its high on 10-March of 9656.5. (Fed’s Core PCE price estimate for end-of-2025 was raised from 2.5% in December to 2.8% in last week’s SEP). On February 18, just over one month ago, SFRU6 settled 9603, so the yield is down 50 bps in a month. The market doesn’t seem to be embracing the idea of a sustained increase in inflation. The current EFFR (Fed Effective Rate) is 4.33%, so SFRU6 yield is 87 bps lower.
Below is the red/gold pack spread. It’s nearing the high made in September just before the initial 50 bp Fed cut from 5.25-5.5% to 4.75-5%.

Let’s take a look at pricing going into the Fed’s initial ease in September. We can see that the red/gold pack spread rallied through Q3 2024 as easing expectations grew. The unraveling of the spread after the initial 50bp cut (late Sept thru November) was sparked by fears that inflation might be re-kindled by the oversized move. (It was). SFRH6, the second red at the time, sold off from 9720 to 9610 on Nov 12. SFRU6 followed the same script, 9720.5 high settle on 10-Sept, to 9614.5 on 12-Nov.
Let’s review the Survey of Economic Projections from the September 2024 meeting, focusing specifically on the 2025 predictions.

In September, the second red, which was SFRH6 at the time, had traded up to 9720 just before the FOMC. At the time, the Fed ratcheted DOWN inflation estimates from 2.3% for PCE prices and Core, to 2.1 and 2.2 (yellow highlight). So 2.8% in second red futures price vs 2.1 for inflation, a spread of around 60 to 70 bps. Low given estimates for the neutral rate.
But we’re in a similar place now. 2.7 to 2.8 for inflation estimate vs second red of 3.50%, a spread of 70 to 80 bps.
My view is that the Fed is likely overshooting the inflation estimates for end-of-2025, just as they undershot in September. We’ll probably end up somewhere in the middle, 2.3 to 2.5.
In early September, FF midpoint was 5.375%, and the second red had traded to 2.80%, over 250 bps lower. Currently, from a 4.375% midpoint, the second red yield is about 3.5%, or 90 bps lower.
My conclusion, to paraphrase Powell’s description of the economy and policy, is that we’re in a pretty good place in terms of the price/yield levels for red SOFR contracts. My thought is that inflation estimates are currently too high, so there’s probably room on the upside for reds, but overall pricing makes sense.
Expanding a bit further, the chart below is ESM5 in white, with an overly of SFRU5/SFRU6/SFRU7 butterfly in green. The fly is (SFRU5 – SFRU6) – (SFRU6 – SFRU7). As SFRU6 rallies more than the wing contracts, the fly declines in price. In the last couple of months, S&Ps and the fly have tracked closely. But in the past few sessions, stocks bounced while U5U6U7 made new lows.

So what? There are a lot of correlated markets that have nothing to say about causation. (Though it appears that the fly has been the leader). I would simply summarize, ‘stocks selling off in a financialized economy means that reds rally hardest.’ It’s not all that obvious in terms of constructing new trades given moves that have already been significant.
My interpretation of the fly is that the Fed’s ‘inertia’ concerning near-term rate cuts is due to tariff-related inflation fears. SOFR contracts one year forward (reds) are sniffing out economic weakness, accentuated by falling asset values. Beyond the reds, an increase in term premia could result from a weaker economy where budget deficits worsen due to lower tax receipts and higher gov’t benefits, for example, higher unemployment payments.
An interesting quote from Luke Gromen’s Forest for the Trees that someone passed along to me:
“The time for delicate talk is over, so we will be blunt: You cannot “detox” the US economy when debt/GDP is 120%, deficits/GDP are 7%, and “True Interest Expense” is 108% of all-time high receipts, all of which are dependent on ever-rising asset prices to prevent a decline in consumer spending and US Federal receipts.”
3/14/2025 | 3/21/2025 | chg | ||
UST 2Y | 401.7 | 394.6 | -7.1 | wi 392.5 |
UST 5Y | 408.4 | 400.8 | -7.6 | wi 401.4 |
UST 10Y | 431.0 | 424.8 | -6.2 | |
UST 30Y | 461.5 | 459.2 | -2.3 | |
GERM 2Y | 218.7 | 213.2 | -5.5 | |
GERM 10Y | 287.4 | 276.5 | -10.9 | |
JPN 20Y | 226.4 | 226.2 | -0.2 | |
CHINA 10Y | 185.1 | 185.2 | 0.1 | |
SOFR M5/M6 | -47.5 | -59.5 | -12.0 | |
SOFR M6/M7 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | |
SOFR M7/M8 | 12.5 | 14.0 | 1.5 | |
EUR | 108.79 | 108.22 | -0.57 | |
CRUDE (CLK5) | 66.91 | 68.28 | 1.37 | |
SPX | 5638.94 | 5667.56 | 28.62 | 0.5% |
VIX | 21.77 | 19.28 | -2.49 | |
MOVE | 101.01 | 94.54 | -6.47 | |
Bonds tentatively embrace the QT reduction
March 21, 2025
****************
–Yields slightly lower yesterday with 2s, 5s and 10s down around 2.5 bps to 3.853%, 4.005% and 4.231%. Same on the SOFR strip with all contracts in the first 4 years up 2 to 3.5. Peak contract remains SFRU6 at 9652 (3.48%).
–Sev’l large treasury option trades. Pre-open exit seller of 50k FVJ 108.0c at 7 (April expires today, FVM5 settled 108-005). During the day replacement buys of 50k FVK 110c for 6.5 early, then up to 8 for another 50k. DV01 is approx $44 on the contract, 2 points out of the money, call it 45 bps away for the 110 strike. Somewhere around 3.55% on current 5y (DV01 is $44.4 per $100k). Other decent size buys in TY calls as well, for example TYK 112.5c 31 paid vs 111-14. Open interest up 19k, settled 25 ref 111-055. Total OI in FV futures +11k and in TY +53k.
–There has been a decent move in Accenture (ACN). On February 5, high of 398.25. Yesterday slammed and closed 300.91. So that’s right around an even 25% loss in a month-and-a-half. No big deal…it’s just a single company, but what I found interesting is that they blamed a slowdown in Gov’t work. …”federal services accounted for about 8% of its global revenue and about 16% of its Americas revenue in the 2024 fiscal year.”
According to Google: “In 2024, federal government spending was approximately 23.1%
of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while federal receipts (revenue) were around 16.8% of GDP.
–If one company, where the revenue derived from gov’t isn’t even near the Fed govt share of GDP, can be hammered, how about everyone else? Btw FedEx also crushed post-earnings, down 8% to a new low this morning. Big quarterly OpEx today in stocks.
https://blinks.bloomberg.com/news/stories/STFF5HT0G1KW
This link is for the Treasury General Account. Mentioned several times by Powell at press conference in terms of liquidity impact.